Technical Meeting Paper

201303 – Wullems, Nikandros & Furnell – How Safe is Safe Enough? A Socio-technical View of Low-cost Level Crossing Safety

Downloads are only accessible for registered, logged in, users. Click here to log in.

Low-cost level crossings are often criticized as being unsafe. Does a SIL (safety integrity level) rating make the railway crossing any safer? This paper discusses how a supporting argument might be made for low-cost level crossing warning devices with lower levels of safety integrity and issues such as risk tolerability and derivation of tolerable hazard rates for system-level hazards.

As part of the design of such systems according to fail-safe principles, the paper considers the assumptions around the pre-defined safe states of existing warning devices and how human factors issues around such states can give rise to additional hazards.

Date of paper.

March 15th, 2013

Author Details

Christian Wullems, George Nikandros & Peter Nelson-Furnell

Cooperative Research Centre for Rail Innovation, Australian Safety Critical Systems Associations & Public Transport Victoria

Scroll to Top