Technical Meeting Paper
201303 – Wullems, Nikandros & Furnell – How Safe is Safe Enough? A Socio-technical View of Low-cost Level Crossing Safety
Downloads are only accessible for registered, logged in, users. Click here to log in.
Low-cost level crossings are often criticized as being unsafe. Does a SIL (safety integrity level) rating make the railway crossing any safer? This paper discusses how a supporting argument might be made for low-cost level crossing warning devices with lower levels of safety integrity and issues such as risk tolerability and derivation of tolerable hazard rates for system-level hazards.
As part of the design of such systems according to fail-safe principles, the paper considers the assumptions around the pre-defined safe states of existing warning devices and how human factors issues around such states can give rise to additional hazards.